Walking the line

“There’s a fine line between not doing enough and allowing homelessness” (Samantha Green, ASR). How do counties, more specifically cities, walk the line and find a common ground that neither promotes or admonishes homelessness? We all know that there are wrong ways to help the homeless, but is there a right way? If so, what would the “right way” look like?

Through her work as a case manager for Applied Survey Research, Green suggests that one of the best places to begin to assist the homeless is by conducting detailed homeless counts. Each county that receives federal funding is required to conduct homeless counts. However, since there are no universal guidelines and no funding allocated for counties to administer the counts, the counts tend to lack consistency and depth. If the state or federal government allocated money to conduct homeless counts then our society would offer more effective care strategies for the homeless.

Many counties fear that offering more services to the homeless draw larger groups of displaced individuals to their cities. Known as the Magnet Theory, Green implied that the reason why a large number of counties refuse to do accurate counts is because they don’t want to “attract” more homeless people to the area. Though services are an added incentive, most homeless people migrate for reasons of safety, job opportunities, weather, etc.  What do inaccurate homeless counts mean for the homeless people residing in the community?

County to County

This weeks data exercise put faces to the countless numbers of people who are homeless. While researching Riverside County I found that there was 31% decrease in homelessness between 2011 and 2013. In 2011 the homeless population was 4,321 people and in 2013 the homeless population was 2,979. Of that 2,979, 1,888 people were unsheltered and 1,090 were sheltered. Within Riverside County, the city of Riverside had the most homeless people at 571.

These may just seem like numbers but each one represents a specific individual. Seeing these numbers and the methods they used to come up with these statistics really put things into perspective.  I was surprised by the numbers in Riverside County because I thought that the numbers were a  lower compared to other counties. During my research I found that San Bernardino is the poorest county in California. The fact that Riverside County and San Bernardino County are so close to each other really shows the effect that bordering cities have towards one another.

For example, Pasadena, California tends to be an extremely upscale city. With that being said, homeless people often are not present. But less than 15 minutes away in Downtown Los Angeles is the greatest population of homeless people living on skid row. Our society stereotypes people to where we think they should reside. People believe that if someone is homeless then they should be with the rest of the homeless population. This is something that needs to be changed and by doing research and making people aware of the homeless populations within their own counties gives them the opportunity to step in a try to make a difference.

http://dpss.co.riverside.ca.us/files/pdf/riverside-county2013homelesscountandsubpopulationsurvey-6.3.pdf

Importance of Accurately Counting Homeless Populations

As the Applied Survey Research website states, “The United States federal government … requires counties to count their homeless populations every two years in order to be eligible for continued federal funding” (ASR ). Because of this, counties are required to complete a Point In-Time count of homeless individuals in their county every two years. Other than requiring that this process be carried out, counties have few limitations or guidelines to follow.

While Point In Time counts seem like a good idea in theory, the truth of the matter is that each county has a high level of autonomy when it comes to deciding how these PIT counts are to be completed. While some counties perform entire canvasing techniques of counting, others do partial counts and sampling methods. This illustrates the potential flaws of these counts and their accuracy, as counties can very well represent the number that they want to represent their city versus the actual counts. The key problem is that some cities believe that high levels of homelessness in their region points to structural problems in the city, reflecting negatively on them. Because of this, their goal may be to find a very low number of homeless individuals.  However, this is not a good strategy in the long run because they will not obtain information on the main issues the homeless are facing or what services they require.
When it comes to counting in these Point In Time counts, each county has the option of deciding how they will carry out their counts of the homeless population. Another issue that surrounds each individual county gathering data in the ways that they want is that it would be incredibly difficult to compare two cities who have obtained the data in such different processes. While one city may place high importance on gathering the most accurate data on their homeless, another may downplay their amount of homeless by minimalistically sekking their data.
Some of the issues with gaining an accurate count, even if the cities are very concerned with obtaining good data is the lack of funding. Although these counts are a requirement of the Federal Government does not provide the funding to make these Point In Time counts happen. This means that the financial burden of carrying out these counts lies on the country itself. While counties and some non-profit organizations sponsor the counts, it seems that if there is a high importance of gathering accurate data on the amounts of homeless individuals, there needs to be additional government funding. Otherwise, each city can skimp by and gather their counts and other data as minimalistically as possible without any reprecussions. While it is very important to continue to produce these counts of homeless individuals, it is also important to gather reliable data and counts that are as accurate as possible. Without increased attention to the accuracy of these counts, it will be nearly impossible to offer the services and care that adequately serve the needs of the homeless.

 

http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/homeless/

Problems with P.I.T.

I found a news article on CNN today that relates perfectly to what we have been discussing in class for the past week. This article discusses some of the problems encountered during the P.I.T. (Point-in-Time) count of Camden County, New Jersey. Camden is the poorest city in the U.S. and has an unemployment rate of 13%. Yet last year’s P.I.T. count found only “589 homeless people in the 513,000-person county.” This makes it the perfect example of an area with a very understated homeless count.

As we’ve seen throughout this past week, there are many problems with the current system of P.I.T. counting. P.I.T. counts takes place within a 24-hour period in the last week of January at least every other year. These counts are required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for each county, but they are not funded by the government. There’s the first problem –  without proper funding, of course we are not going to get an accurate count. Furthermore, as the homeless in the CNN video repeated many times, homeless people often don’t want to be seen. There are many places that probably go unchecked by counters simply because they can’t see them. There are plenty of homeless sleeping in cars, couchsurfing, living in abandoned buildings or “tent cities,”and hopping back and forth from the street to various family members’ homes. All of these people fit HUD’s description of homeless. Yet they most often are not being counted in the “homeless census.”

Obviously, it is close to impossible to get a completely accurate count of homeless, since the numbers change from day to day as it is. But as shown by this article and the other data we have seen this week, there is a great importance in improving the P.I.T. count. The homeless are being under-counted and therefore misrepresented. These counts determine how much federal aid is given to the shelter systems, so they directly affect the people being misrepresented.

creating transformations

After discussing the “Housing and Urban Development: Homeless assistance Programs” and PIT counts in class, I became more educated on the several methods the government practice to identify the number of chronic homelessness occurring in our communities.  Counting and Surveying the homeless population is an efficient strategy to understand and assist the homeless needs to improve their access of social services.  One of the factors that was disturbing to recognize was the large number of unsheltered homeless people in counties were homelessness seemed to be seen hidden from the population.  Therefore, it brought to my attention in what way can our communities can express the voice of the homeless to reach the others the necessary help to stabilize their lives and our communities to become a better society.  Many people get educated of the causes of homelessness by the observations and experiences they have encounter with a homeless person, but they disregard the facts that homelessness is expanding annually in our neighborhood.

I believe that encouraging people to get involve in our communities and educate them in HUD assisting programs and its outcome towards the reduction of homeless can improve the reliable services families obtain.  Being able to be informed more about in depth homelessness have broaden my thoughts in understanding homelessness through another  vision of what I was accustomed to, and learning more about the complexities of the subject.

https://www.onecpd.info/resources/documents/UnshelteredCountsGuide.pdf

http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/homeless/

 

Portland Responds to Homeless Mistreatment

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/14/portland-homelessness-illegal_n_4790205.html

I was reading the news and came across an article about a group of activists in Portland, Oregon, who held a demonstration protesting the mistreatment of homeless people in their state. Their action was in direct response to the mayor’s recent action to bring back a bill that would permit the police force to awaken slumbering homeless people on the streets and force them to move elsewhere. In the eyes of the Portland activists, this act makes being homeless a crime – something they deem to be inhumane and unfair.

I completely agree with this group of people. I think it is abominable to criminalize homelessness. How can any person with a heart seek to punish someone because they don’t have somewhere secure to lay their heads at night? If the mayor wants people off the streets then he needs to stop talking about investing more money in shelters and actually do it. This article reminds me of the film, “Taylors Campaign,” that we watched in class several weeks ago. In the documentary, one of the primary issues that the street people who were interviewed mentioned was mistreatment and both physical and verbal abuse suffered at the hands of the very people paid to protect citizens and their rights. Being homeless does not mean that you have to relinquish your rights or your dignity and so I find it infuriating that these people are treated so poorly. The way homeless people are forcibly removed reminds me of the way farm animals are rounded up and shipped elsewhere. That is why I found the work being done by the Portland activists to be admirable. I am so glad that so many people in the United States are working to improve conditions for our fellow citizens who have fallen upon hard times and could use a hand in getting back on their feet.

PIT Counts

The Federal Government requires counties to do a Point In Time count of homeless people in their county. However, they do not provide funding to make these counts happen and they do not look into the results any more than seeing if it was simply completed or not. One question you may ask, how do they fund these counts if the federal government does not provide any funding? These counts are sponsored by non-profit organizations and some cities and counties contribute money. Another question that may occur, if the federal government is not taking these counts very seriously then why should the counties that are doing the counts take them seriously? Through the results of the PIT counts over the last decade or so there are trends that demonstrate which counties are counting just so they can check off the requirement and those who are actively counting to make sense of the data collected. There are often counties who are in denial about the number of homeless and they claim they have less than what they really do have. Then there are also some counties who collect more data beyond just if someone is homeless or not. They look into other demographics so that they can better understand why homelessness is a problem and what they can do to fix it. For example, cities with better social services attract homelessness. This is something worth looking in to because that would be an explanation of why a cities number of homeless is high.

There are multiple different methods that Applied Survey Research uses to count homeless, which include; street count, shelter and institution count, telephone survey, and homeless survey. With these different methods, PIT counts are not always accurate and it would be hard to compare two cities counts if they are using different methods.

PIT counts are important for counties to participate in but only if they are doing them accurately. With the right funding and the proper method of counting we could understand homelessness better.

http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/homeless/

Applied Research Survey

The Hearth act was passed in 2009 but not implemented until 2013.  The Hearth act looks at how the population can be broken down into sub-populations. I also learned through this Skype session that if you want good data, you have to pay for it. Methodology is different for all communities. A team of three goes out early in the morning before sunrise and has a map of the area that they are supposed to cover; one being a driver, one being the recorder, and one being the looker. They drive around counting their best looking under bridges, inside coffee shops, etc. Some counts may be counted by sheriffs or city police in more difficult places like in San Francisco on the Golden Gate Bridge. Learning all of this information has showed me that our society takes importance to our homelessness. These facts really show you how much consideration our society should be taking for the homelessness. Such as in California let alone, “there are 45,554 homeless people that are sheltered which makes up 33% of California. While there are 91,272 unsheltered homeless people which make up 67% of California” (Samantha Green).

Understanding and Responsibilities

Statistics prove that homelessness is a large systematic problem rather than an individual problem. Some methods in counting homeless people seek to minimize and deny the problem. After a foundation of what homeless life is like and examining statistics I am emotionally struck and determined to seek solutions. After beginning the book, Beside the Golden Door Policy, Politics, and the Homeless by James Wright, Beth Rubin, and Joel Devine, I am acquiring a better understanding of the issues, controversies, theories, social and demographic characteristics of the homeless, and methods of counting the homeless. I have uncovered several important points that contribute to a better understanding of homelessness. In addition, I am synthesizing similar ideas and data between this course, Hunger and Homelessness and Public Policy Analysis.

Beside the Golden Door is a combination of the authors own experience and social science and advocacy literature. In order to tackle homelessness a comprehensive understanding is required. This involves debunking myths. For instance uncovering facts show, “half or more of the homeless people do abuse alcohol and other drugs, but the other half do not” (7). Understanding the homeless population leads to developing effective solutions. Cost benefit analysis and a rationalism approach can be applied by policymakers. The “quality of urban life would improve if there were fewer homeless people” (9) because more individuals could contribute economically to markets and rely less on governmental assistance.

Understanding the homeless population can lead to coming up with effective solutions. The average age of homeless adults is in the mid-thirties due to the large non-means tested spending on Medicare and social security for the retired population. The welfare system is flawed because the people who need the assistance the most are the least likely to receive it. In the course Public Policy Analysis our most recent topic was welfare. The 1996 Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) has many failures, with the primary failure of a sharp decline in TANF caseloads. The TANF to poverty ratio fell in all states, but the impact differed in regions. Other flaws in TANF include block grants, contingency funds, restrictive eligibility policies, and short time limits.

A leading obstacle is the loss of low income housing, “the solution to homelessness is less poverty and more low-income housing, everything else treats the symptoms of homelessness but not the root causes” (29). Eradicating homelessness and helping those who are homeless conflicts with the underlying principles of the U.S. economy. A comprehensive approach to understanding homelessness is necessary. My hope is as a society we can move beyond hiding the problem and toward solving the problem.

*To purchase Beside the Golden Door: http://www.amazon.com/Beside-Golden-Door-Politics-Institutions/dp/0202306143/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1392499074&sr=8-

* To read more about TANF

2&keywords=Beside+the+golden+door TANF Center on Budgetand Policy Priorities

 

100,000 Homes Campaign

While reading the ASR reports, listening to past presentations, and beginning internships, the main problem that seems to be throughout each is how homeless people can escape homelessness. Homeless people face many societal and personal challenges each day. Communities will offer various forms of assistance, but often there is a lack of resources available. In two of the ASR reports (which provides statistical information about the homeless population in a given city) both had populations of 50% that were ‘chronically homeless’. Those who are homeless may have strategies to help them survive, but there financial stability is almost impossible without proper resources to successfully transition out of homelessness.

In Tell Them Who I Am by Liebow, he argues that there are structural and policy based obstacles to homelessness and that a main factor is providing housing assistance as a stepping stone out of homelessness. A recent 60 minutes special addresses the need for such stepping stones as the ‘100,000 Homes Campaign’ is discussed. This campaign works with non-profits and local governments to provide permanent homes for those who are chronically homeless and have health problems. A person is not discriminated against if they are alcoholics or drug abusers, the main goal is to house those who are considered to be high risk. So far they’ve raised funds to house about 80,000. This campaign encourages people to join through compassion but also finances. The organization promotes that it cost taxpayers more than to help them afford homes, “The inability to tend to your basic healthcare needs, results in people on the streets ending up in emergency rooms and ending up in in-patient hospitalizations. And one night in the hospital is a whole month’s rent on most places.”

We have learned about many examples where the homeless are ignored, forced out of public spaces, and dehumanized. This campaign is a prime example of a positive way to help people out of homelessness. They are bringing communities together to raise funds and directly address the issue.

To review 60 Minutes article click here: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/100000-homes-housing-homeless-saves-money/

To look at ASR reports click here: http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/homeless/