For my teaching project, I invited members of my family as well as neighbors to my home in Riverside, California. There were drinks and snacks provided. I set up rows of chairs in the living room area. Here about 15 members of my family gathered to hear me speak at the front of the room. I focused on two topics from our class. The first was breaking stereotypes. I chose this topic because stereotypes are really detrimental to the homeless. If the blame can be placed on an individual’s bad life choices, then there is never a need to question the bigger picture. This is also important because if the audience failed to understand the other aspects of the teaching project and the bigger picture, maybe at the least, this talk about stereotypes would change how they interact with the homeless and panhandlers in their own lives. The second thing I wanted to focus on was the structural causes of homelessness. The shift the blame from the individual to the structural.
I opened up the talk by introducing them to the class and what we have covered over the semester. I passed around the syllabus and some of the books that we’ve read. To dive into the subject matter, I started out by showing the audience a few short videos from Invisible people.org. This is the website that we interacted with at the beginning of the class this semester. It showed people talking in their own words about life on the street and how they got where they are. I thought this would be a better way for the ‘breaking stereotypes’ as it is easier to make a human connection with this demographic if you are hearing their stories in their own voices. There was a small discussion afterwards about their reactions to the videos. The next phase of the talk was me presenting them various aspects of the structural issues. I printed out maps, charts and some statistics that went along with my talking points. Then there was a wrap up discussion at the end. During this time, I answered any final questions. I also asked each person to write down something new they learned, a question they still had, or any sort of reflection on the topics that had been covered.
Overall, I think the event went well. The audience was engaged in discussion and really contemplated the material. Members of the audience brought up their own personal ties to certain struggles as well as issues that I did not mention. Most of them understood the structural causes but at times revealed that their view of homeless individuals were still stereotypical.